MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520190632 · doi:10.7202/029717ar

Les « zones de non-droit »

2009· article· fr· W1520190632 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceIndignationArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les démocraties occidentales, les évolutions de la politique migratoire ces trois dernières décennies se traduisent dans l’évolution des pratiques administratives de contrôle et l’institution de procédures de détention aux frontières : tel est le cas de la « Zone d’attente pour personnes en instances » en France. La gestion des migrations à travers la mise en place, pour les migrants, de situations limites de contrôle et de désubjectivation pose en retour la question des effets politiques de l’enfermement des étrangers dans l’espace public de la société d’accueil. Loin des images de rationalité et de maximisation de la gestion, ces pratiques ne sont pas seulement à comprendre au regard d’un objectif de contrôle des populations étrangères. Elles s’inscrivent dans une économie complexe des émotions, qui fait jouer inquiétude, protection, indignation et compassion, et sont porteuses d’enjeux de légalisation et de légitimation dans l’espace politique démocratique, aussi bien que d’une redéfinition des pratiques de gouvernement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.264
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it