Reflections of the Book of Job and Gregory’s <i>Moralia</i> in Chaucer’s “Monk’s Tale”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In one of the crucial scenes in James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man an appalled Stephen Dedalus is listening to the Lenten homily on the pains of hell that await unrepentant sinners. The Jesuit preacher is implicitly echoing the same despairing outcries from Righteous Job about the darkness of hell that Chaucer’s Pilgrim-Parson explicitly recalled on the road to Canterbury some five centuries before. The two preachers have the same purpose: to arouse so overwhelming a sense of contrition in the sinner that heartfelt repentance and unrestrained confession will pour out. Both are also well aware of the central place occupied in the Office of the Dead by lectiones from the Book of Job. As Lawrence Besserman explains, Job became "the principal biblical figure in the fully developed Office of the Dead of the High Middle Ages," and the text of the office in use at Salisbury Cathedral, the so-called Sarum Use, well known of course to Chaucer, "had gained wide acceptance and had what amounted to official recognition from Rome.".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".