MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hommes et femmes face à la santé dans la Russie post-soviétique

2007· article· fr· W1520444951 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia Grigorieva, Tatiana Tchoubarova

Bibliographic record

VenueTranscontinentales · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quatre thèmes sont d’une importance décisive pour comprendre la dimension de genre qui affecte la politique de santé publique et le système de soins en Russie : les différences hommes femmes dans la perception que chaque groupe se fait de sa santé ; la disparité des indicateurs de mortalité et de morbidité ; l’inégal accès financier aux soins, et les problèmes spécifiques des femmes atteintes du virus du sida. Les questions de genre sont certes discutées en Russie, mais surtout dans des groupes d’experts, et l’action gouvernementale en la matière reste fragmentaire. L’approche du genre, telle que l’illustre la problématique de la santé, n’est pas partie prenante des stratégies de développement. Quand elle se manifeste, elle est plus une réponse à une attente mondiale qu’elle ne témoigne d’une véritable conscience de l’importance des problèmes de genre pour l’avenir de la société russe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranscontinentalesSame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207