MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520505118

Baking as Biography: A Life Story in Recipes

2012· article· en· W1520505118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Folklore · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreBiographyWifePortraitNarrativeArt historyEvocationHistoryLiteratureArtTheologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baking as Biography: A Life Story in Recipes. By Diane Tye. (Montreal: McGillQueen's University Press, 2010. Pp. xiv + 268, list of recipes, list of illustrations, acknowledgments, notes, works cited, index. $75.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.)Baking as Biography is less a story than an evocation of the meanings of baking in die life of Laurene Tye and odier homemakers during die middle twentieth century. Written by her daughter, Canadian folklorist Diane Tye, Baking breaks new methodological ground, transcending genres in a work that is simultaneously scholarly and profoundly personal. Besides making a solid contribution to interdisciplinary research on women's lives, folklore methods, and food studies, Tye's narrative demonstrates die complexities of belonging, caring, and gratitude inherent in family life.Tye's mediod looks to varied source materials to illustrate key points, but she also manages to maintain a sense of wholeness about her subject, conveying a rich portrait of her mother's life. Source materials include recipes and oral history, interpreted from die perspective of food and feminist dieory. For over diree decades, Laurene was married to a minister, so Tye references general studies of ministers' wives, including die journal of L.M. Montgomery (a minister's wife in her own right) as well. As Diane Tye was unable to formally interview her deceased modier, she includes her own reminiscences, set apart in a distinct font. In addition, photographs, recipes (some written by hand on cards) , and die occasional platter-shaped page break symbol contribute to a pleasing, readable, and innovative design.Tye uses her findings to support radier than challenge prevailing narratives about women and food; she has vetted sources for those concepts she finds most valuable and diose diat her family's narrative substantiates. Thus she employs die major figures in food studies (Avakian, Counihan, Douglas, Bourdieu, Mennel, Sack and odiers) in guiding readers to understand the recipes' high quantities of sugar, which dishes were appropriate for which occasions (and why) , and die emotional space of a woman who spent significant time in die kitchen despite an active dislike for cooking and a spouse who regarded food as a mere biological necessity.Tye demonstrates how recipes from Laurene's card file and favorite community cookbook (Tested Sweet Recipes) represent the rhydims of Laurene's life (particularly during child-rearing) , die functions for which she baked (family meals, church socials, women's teas, visiting clergy), and her social networks. The names of recipe contributors recall women she knew well to diose who figured in her life only briefly (though dieir recipes may have had a more lasting impact) . They also echo her husband's work, as he too remembers contributors' names and die struggles through which he worked to support diem. Much of die narrative relies on oral history - from daughter, son, and husband to church colleagues and friends. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it