MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520635673 · doi:10.2196/mhealth.2866

Metadata Correction: Usage of Multilingual Mobile Translation Applications in Clinical Settings

2013· erratum· en· W1520635673 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Urs‐Vito Albrecht, Marianne Behrends, Regina Schmeer, Matthies Hk, Ute von Jan

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2013
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmHealthComputer scienceMetadataWorld Wide WebMobile appsInternet privacyMedicineNursingPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors of "Usage of Multilingual Mobile Translation Applications in Clinical Settings" (JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2013 (Apr 23); 1(1):e4) inadvertently omitted Regina Schmeer (Nursing Department, Hannover Medical School) from the list of authors during the submission process. The author Schmeer should have been added after Marianne Behrends in the originally published manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.243
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.243
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.531
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealthSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207