MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520644368 · doi:10.7202/1012096ar

Magog’s Church of Sainte-Marguerite-Marie and the Architectural Dynamics Between Two of Québec’s Founding Institutions During the Twentieth Century: The Roman Catholic Church and the Corporate Industrial Manufactory

2012· article· en· W1520644368 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Caroline Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureFactory (object-oriented programming)Shadow (psychology)SociologyIndustrial RevolutionCorporationManagementLawHistoryArt historyVisual artsArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case study conducts a spatial and visual analysis of Magog’s church of Sainte-Marguerite-Marie, located in the Eastern Townships of Québec, based on the plans designed by Sherbrooke architect Joseph Aimé Poulin between 1946 and 1949. The working class community’s social history will be considered in terms of the factory workers’ collective commitment to build a rare and exceptional church in the shadow of the Dominion Textile Company’s imposing factory. The intent is to illustrate how the relative monumentality of the church and its streamlined design respond to the factory both directly and indirectly. The building is not only a product of the architect’s creative vision and technical logic and skill; his clients’, the factory workers’, expectations and motivations merit significant consideration as well. The professional climate of religious architecture during the period also deserves attention, as does the environment within which the building was inserted, and how that building responded to its existing surrounding urban landscape. Finally, this essay presents the church’s architecture as a rather extra-ordinary example of the modern design influence inserted into an otherwise marginalized neighbourhood historically rooted in traditional values, practices and beliefs, positioned at the crossroads between the textile industry and the Roman Catholic Church.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207