Experimental investigation of airflow over helicopter platform of a polar icebreaker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The airwake over the helicopter platform of a Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) polar icebreaker was studied experimentally. By application of high speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) on a 1:522 scaled model of the polar icebreaker, quantitative flow filed data were obtained in several vertical and horizontal planes. Present investigation was conducted with two types of the inflow conditions: (i) a uniform flow and (ii) a simulated atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). The incidence angle (α) varied between 0° to 330° with the increment of 30°. The unsteadiness of the flow was demonstrated by calculation of standard deviation of vertical airflow velocity (σ) over the helicopter platform, which directly influences the pilot workload. It was observed that, despite having relatively the same trend in different angels of incidence, the maximum value of σ is generally higher in the case of simulated ABL. It could be attributed to higher velocity gradients in oncoming flow associated with the simulated ABL inflow condition. Additionally this investigation showed that, in both inflow conditions, incidence angles of 0° and 300° were associated with the highest values for σ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".