The Seventeenth Century on Film: Patriarchy, Magistracy, and Witchcraft in British Horror Films, 1968-1971
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article soutient qu’une série de films faits entre 1968 et 1971 et dont l’action se déroule au dix-septième siècle, marque l’arrivée d’une transformation, non seulement du cadre typique du film d’horreur britannique, mais aussi de la façon dont est représentée l’autorité patriarcale dans les oeuvres d’horreur britanniques. Alors que les films à l’étude ont souvent été lus comme véhiculant et assurant la défense de différents courants de la contreculture, reflétant ainsi le mécontentement social typique des années soixante à travers le prisme déformant du dix-septième siècle, cet article endosse la position contraire. Il entend montrer que situer l’action des films au dix-septième siècle a permis aux réalisateurs de films d’horreur qui travaillaient pour la petite compagnie de production Tigon d’endosser à nouveau une forme de patriarcat que les studios Hammer, les plus gros d’Angleterre, remettaient en question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".