Les logiques du multiculturalisme dans les sociétés multinationales : une analyse des discours canadiens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’inspirant de l’exemple canadien, cet article explore les relations entre le multinationalisme et le multiculturalisme au sein d’une même société. Si le premier concerne l’accommodement des minorités dites » nationales », le deuxième s’adresse aux minorités ethniques d’origine immigrée, dont il vise l’intégration dans la société majoritaire. Bien qu’analytiquement distincts, ces deux mouvements sociaux et les politiques respectives sont interdépendants. Dans cet article, nous examinons les argumentations, puisées dans la presse canadienne, qui servent à légitimer ou à délégitimer le multiculturalisme d’origine immigrée en regard du nationalisme minoritaire québécois. Notre recherche nous permet d’identifier quatre scénarios selon la manière dont l’accommodement des groupes » nationaux » historiquement établis influe sur la mise en œuvre des politiques multiculturelles en réponse à une diversité récente, induite par l’immigration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".