The contribution of intrapulmonary shunts to the alveolar‐to‐arterial oxygen difference during exercise is very small
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exercise is well known to cause arterial PO2 to fall and the alveolar-arterial PO2 difference(Aa PO2 ) to increase. Until recently, the physiological basis for this was considered to be mostly ventilation/perfusion ((.)VA/(.)Q) inequality and alveolar-capillary diffusion limitation. Recently, arterio-venous shunting through dilated pulmonary blood vessels has been proposed to explain a significant part of the Aa PO2 during exercise. To test this hypothesis we determined venous admixture during 5 min of near-maximal, constant-load, exercise in hypoxia (in inspired O2 fraction, FIO2 , 0.13), normoxia (FIO2 , 0.21) and hyperoxia (FIO2 , 1.0) undertaken in balanced order on the same day in seven fit cyclists ((.)VO2max, 61.3 +/- 2.4 ml kg(-1) min(-1); mean +/- S.E.M.). Venous admixture reflects three causes of hypoxaemia combined: true shunt, diffusion limitation and ((.)VA/(.)Q) inequality. In hypoxia, venous admixture was 22.8 +/- 2.5% of the cardiac output; in normoxia it was 3.5 +/- 0.5%; in hyperoxia it was 0.5 +/- 0.2%. Since only true shunt accounts for venous admixture while breathing 100% O2, the present study suggests that shunt accounts for only a very small portion of the observed venous admixture, Aa PO2 and hypoxaemia during heavy exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".