MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520979278

Capacitively center-loaded transmission lines for compact E-band 90° couplers

2011· article· en· W1520979278 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Haroun, Calvin Plett

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Microwave Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReturn lossMicrostripCenter frequencyTransceiverMaterials scienceHybrid couplerElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringInsertion lossOptoelectronicsPhysicsPower dividers and directional couplersEngineeringAntenna (radio)Band-pass filterCMOS
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A compact 80-GHz band (81–86 GHz) 90° coupler using capacitively center-loaded microstrip transmission lines is proposed. The coupler is implemented in a 0.15 µm GaAs pHEMT technology and has longitudinal and transverse arms of the same characteristic impedances of 50-Ω to reduce the effect of manufacturing tolerance and to facilitate the layout. The experimental results demonstrated a phase difference close to 87o and an amplitude imbalance of less than 1 dB over the entire frequency band of interest (81–86 GHz). The measured return loss is less than −11 dB and the isolation is better than 15 dB. The proposed coupler is well suited for low-cost, high performance, ultra high data rate transceivers for E-band wireless communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Microwave ConferenceSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207