MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521250982 · doi:10.25100/cdea.v14i20.251

La escuela de Montreal sobre humanismo y gestión

2011· article· es· W1521250982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Administración · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta perspectiva tiene como pionero a Maurice Dufour quien en Francia, a comienzos de la década de los sesenta inicio los trabajos sobre el tema de la Escuela Superior de Ciencias Económicas y Comerciales de Paris (ESSEC). Un alumno suyo, Alain Chanlat continúo estos desarrollos en la Escuela de Altos Estudios Comerciales -HEC- de la Universidad de Montreal, logrando aglutinar un grupo cada vez más numeroso de investigadores. La actividad pionera en HEC fue el Seminario de Ciencias Humanas que se viene ofreciendo ininterrumpidamente desde 1978 en la Maestría en Ciencias de la Gestión y en el programa de Doctorado en Administración. La perspectiva de las Ciencias de la Vida y la Gestión es hoy en día reconocida como una apertura a repensar radicalmente en la Administración (Castrol y Lauriol, 1989), como un llamado a realizar la Administración con rostro humano (Aktouf, 1989) como una corriente dentro del pensamiento administrativo de nuevo tipo (Morgan, 1989).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it