Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta perspectiva tiene como pionero a Maurice Dufour quien en Francia, a comienzos de la década de los sesenta inicio los trabajos sobre el tema de la Escuela Superior de Ciencias Económicas y Comerciales de Paris (ESSEC). Un alumno suyo, Alain Chanlat continúo estos desarrollos en la Escuela de Altos Estudios Comerciales -HEC- de la Universidad de Montreal, logrando aglutinar un grupo cada vez más numeroso de investigadores. La actividad pionera en HEC fue el Seminario de Ciencias Humanas que se viene ofreciendo ininterrumpidamente desde 1978 en la Maestría en Ciencias de la Gestión y en el programa de Doctorado en Administración. La perspectiva de las Ciencias de la Vida y la Gestión es hoy en día reconocida como una apertura a repensar radicalmente en la Administración (Castrol y Lauriol, 1989), como un llamado a realizar la Administración con rostro humano (Aktouf, 1989) como una corriente dentro del pensamiento administrativo de nuevo tipo (Morgan, 1989).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".