MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Computer Intensive Sampling Methods in Ecology

2014· other· en· W1521364046 on OpenAlex
Marie‐Josée Fortin, Geoffrey M. Jacquez, Bill Shipley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJackknife resamplingBonferroni correctionStatisticsStatistical hypothesis testingStatisticResamplingAutocorrelationEconometricsRandomizationComputer scienceMathematicsSampling (signal processing)Test statisticNonparametric statisticsSampling distributionBiologyBioinformaticsClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Here, we focus on alternative significance tests for ecological data that often have skewed distributions, which impair the use of most parametric significance tests based on the normal distribution. Randomization tests have been proposed as an alternative to those classical significance tests where the observed data are repetitively reshuffled to generate a reference distribution that is then used to assess the significance of the statistic under study. Ecological data are also often correlated due to temporal autocorrelation, spatial autocorrelation, or phylogenetic structure, thereby violating assumptions of data independence of many randomization tests. In such circumstances, restricted randomization should be used. Alternatives to randomization tests such as bootstrap and jackknife are presented. Finally, we address the issue of multiple tests and show how the false discovery rate is more appropriate than Bonferroni correction and sequential methods. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it