MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521720362 · doi:10.7202/602027ar

Les familles sans enfant ou avec enfants : aisance ou pauvreté? Les faits au Canada et au Québec de 1971 à 1987

2009· article· fr· W1521720362 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Liliane Brouillette, Claude Felteau, Pierre Lefèbvre, Alain Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueL Actualité économique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le but de cet article est d’analyser le statut économique relatif des couples avec enfants et sans enfant sur la période 1971-1987 au Canada et au Québec. On montre que la présence d’enfants dans les familles entraîne un coût d’opportunité en termes de niveau de vie qui réduit substantiellement la possibilité de vivre selon des standards élevés d’aisance matérielle et accroît le risque de pauvreté. Ceci soulève la question de la cohérence des modifications récentes, divergentes selon les paliers de gouvernement, des régimes de la fiscalité directe et des transferts à l’égard des familles avec enfants, dans le contexte actuel des faibles niveaux de fécondité au Canada et au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Actualité économiqueSame topicGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207