MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521860798 · doi:10.7202/045772ar

Est-on quitte envers le passé ?

2011· article· fr· W1521860798 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Yvan Lamonde

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette analyse fait voir ce qu’on n’a jamais vu chez deux intellectuels québécois de l’après-guerre : la reconduction sur le mode de l’essai par Pierre Vadeboncoeur de la démarche du peintre, Paul-Émile Borduas, auteur du Refus global. À telle enseigne que Pierre Vadeboncoeur esquisse d’une façon remarquable la trajectoire intellectuelle qui va de 1948 à la Révolution tranquille. Cette trajectoire comprend une dimension fondamentale : le rapport radicalement nouveau au passé institué par le Refus global, suivi d’une thématisation par Pierre Vadeboncoeur de la quête d’une substitution au « Notre maître, le passé » et de la recherche d’un maître dans le présent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.020 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207