MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521924058

Sport in the cultures of the ancient world : new perspectives

2010· book· en· W1521924058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zinon Papakonstantinou

Bibliographic record

VenueRoutledge eBooks · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrologueClassicsRomanizationOlympiadHistoryPietyAncient historyAncient GreekArtTheologyArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zinon Papakonstantinou (editor, University of Washington), Prologue: in the Cultures of the Ancient World Paul Christesen (Dartmouth College), Whence 776? Origin of the Date for the First Olympiad Donald Kyle (University of Texas, Arlington), Pan-Hellenism and Particularism: Herodotus on Greekness, Piety, and David Pritchard (University of Queensland), Sport, War and Democracy in Classical Athens Sofie Remijsen (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), Challenged by Egyptians: Greek Sports in the Third century BC Christian Mann (Brown University), Gladiators in the Greek east: a Case Study in Romanization Michael Carter (Brock University), Gladiators and Monomachoi: Greek Attitudes to a Roman 'Cultural Performance' Nigel Kennell (American School of Classical Studies at Athens, International Centre for Hellenic and Mediterranean Studies) The Greek Ephebate in the Roman Period Nigel Crowther (University of Western Ontario), Observations on Boys, Girls, Youths and Age Categories in Roman Sports and Spectacles Zinon Papakonstantinou (University of Washington), Epilogue: Some Perspectives on Ancient Sport

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoutledge eBooksSame topicMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and EducationFrench-language works237,207