Sperm Structural and Motility Changes During Aging in the Brown Norway Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Brown Norway rat provides a useful model to study aging of the male reproductive tract because of the selective age-dependent pathological changes that are found in the testis, epididymis, and prostate. In the testis, there is a clear age-dependent decrease in both steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis. In the epididymis, some striking segment-specific changes occur at the histological and biochemical levels prior to the major loss of spermatogenesis. We hypothesized that formation of spermatozoa in the testis and maturation of spermatozoa in the epididymis (ie, acquisition of motility and loss of the cytoplasmic droplet) may be altered during aging. Changes in the morphology of spermatozoa were assessed by light and electron microscopy. Using computer-assisted sperm analysis, the motility parameters of spermatozoa obtained from the caput and cauda epididymidis of young and old Brown Norway rats were compared. In old animals, we also compared the motility of spermatozoa from epididymides adjacent to regressed testes with those from epididymides adjacent to nonregressed testes. There was a marked increase with age in the number of spermatozoa with abnormal flagellar midpieces; the nature of these defects did not change with age. In caput epididymidis, the percentage of motile sperm was similar in young and old rats. In contrast, the percentage of motile spermatozoa was significantly decreased in cauda epididymidis of old rats; spermatozoa from the regressed testis side had altered motility characteristics. Furthermore, in the cauda epididymidis on the regressed testis side of aged Brown Norway rats, the proportion of spermatozoa that retained their cytoplasmic droplet was markedly elevated. Some of these effects are likely due to changes taking place in spermatozoa during the process of spermatogenesis in the testis (eg, formation of the flagellum), whereas others could occur during sperm maturation in the epididymis (eg, acquisition of motility). The multiple effects of aging on sperm morphology, the acquisition of motility, and the shedding of the cytoplasmic droplet clearly indicate that the quality of spermatozoa is affected by aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".