MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction to Biophotonics

2012· other· en· W1522028513 on OpenAlexaff
Marion Jürgens, Thomas G. Mayerhöfer, Jürgen Popp, Gabriela Lee, Dennis L. Matthews, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiophotonicsPhotonicsNanotechnologyPhysicsMaterials scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sections in this article are Definition of and General Introduction to Biophotonics Definition Visions Connected with Biophotonics Research Why Photons? Fields of Application and Technology Societal Relevance of Biophotonics Fighting Prevalent and Severe Diseases Unmet Medical Needs in T hird W orld Countries Economic Impact of Biophotonics Worldwide Research Activities in Biophotonics Biophotonics – a Cross‐Disciplinary Science Scientific Landscape International Conferences Scientific and Trade Journals Networks and Funding Programs Current Research Trends and Future Goals Photonic Methods for Biomedical Research Photonic Methods for Point‐of‐Care Diagnostics Photonic Methods for Clinical Imaging Photonic Methods for Therapeutic Applications Photonics in Pharmaceutics, Bioanalysis, and Environmental Research The B iophotonics4 L ife W orldwide C onsortium Mission and Purpose of the B iophotonics4 L ife W orldwide C onsortium History and Organization of the C onsortium Node Leaders for the C onsortium Current Activities of the BP 4 L ife C onsortium Medical F ellows Anticipated Role of Industry Potential Future Activities of the C onsortium

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207