MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522058342 · doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2182-9

Design and cohort description of the InterAct Project: an examination of the interaction of genetic and lifestyle factors on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the EPIC Study

2011· article· en· W1522058342 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Claudia Langenberg, Stephen J. Sharp, Nita G. Forouhi, Paul W. Franks, Matthias B. Schulze, Nicola D. Kerrison, Ulf Ekelund, Inês Barroso, Salvatore Panico, María-José Tormo, Joachim Spranger, Simon J. Griffin, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, Pilar Amiano, Eva Ardanáz, Larraitz Arriola, Beverley Balkau, Aurelio Barricarte, Joline W. J. Beulens, Heiner Boeing, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Brian Buijsse, María Dolores Chirlaque López, Françoise Clavel‐Chapelon, Francesca L. Crowe, Panos Deloukas, M. Dorronsoro, Dagmar Drogan, Philippe Froguel, Carlos A. González, Sara Grioni, Leif Groop, Chris Groves, Pierre Hainaut, Jytte Halkjær, G. Hallmans, Torben Hansen, Rudolf Kaaks, Timothy J. Key, Kay‐Tee Khaw, Albert Koulman, Amalia Mattiello, Carmen Navarro, Peter M. Nilsson, T. Norat, Kim Overvad, Luigi Palla, Domenico Palli, Oluf Pedersen, P H M Peeters, J.R. Quirós, A Ramachandran, L. Rodriguez-Suarez, Olov Rolandsson, Dora Romaguera, Isabelle Romieu, Carlotta Sacerdote, María‐José Sánchez, Annelli Sandbæk, Nadia Slimani, Ivonne Sluijs, Annemieke M. W. Spijkerman, Birgit Teucher, Anne Tjønneland, ­Rosario ­Tumino, D L van der A, W. M. Monique Verschuren, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Edith J. M. Feskens, Mark I. McCarthy, Elio Ríboli

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Cancer Research FundMedical Research CouncilAgentschap NLCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEuropean CommissionCancer Research UKWellcome Trust
KeywordsType 2 diabetesCohort studyCohortEPICIncidence (geometry)MedicineGerontologyPsychologyDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations205
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologiaSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207