MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522086612 · doi:10.14288/bcs.v0i128.1550

Mining the Rush: Recent Publications Relating to the Klondike Gold Rush

2010· article· en· W1522086612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlene Porsild

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGold rushArchaeologyHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Two Years in the Klondike and Alaskan Gold-Fields, 1896-1898. by William Haskell • Trail to the Klondike. by Don McCune • The Alaska-Klondike Diary of Elizabeth Robins. by Victoria Joan Moessner, Joanne Gates • Good Time Girls of the Alaska-Yukon Gold Rush. by Lael Morgan • Faith of Fools: A Journal of the Klondike Gold Rush. by William Sharpe • The Klondike Gold Rush: Photographs from 1896-1899. by Graham Wilson • Paddlewheelers of Alaska and the Yukon. by Graham Wilson • Southeast Alaska: Early Photographs of the Great Land. by Graham Wilson

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207