MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522117720

Intergovernmental relations in democratic Spain : interdependence, autonomy, conflict and cooperation

2008· book· en· W1522117720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lourdes López Nieto, Robert Agranoff

Bibliographic record

VenueDykinson eBooks · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyDemocracyPoliticsState (computer science)Political scienceFederal stateWork (physics)Public administrationRegional sciencePolitical economyGeographySociologyLawEngineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume is an important contribution to the political science literature on post-Franco Spain. It emphasizes some of the major features of intergovernmental relations (IGR) between the govemment of the state and the seventeen autonomous communities (AC), as a federal system in all but name has emerged since 1978. Most important, it maps out major state-AC formal relationships in a systematic analytical way as they contribute to the emerging concept of Spanish IGR. In this regard, the scholars who have compiled and analyzed the data reponed herein are to be congratulated for a work that is long overdue. This volume underscores the kind of solid political science work that is necessary to explain the operations of any federal country, along with those with substantial federal features. As such, the study's emphasis on such topics as the debate over the model of the state, positions of the key actors and protagonists in the unfolding of this model, the distribution and then overlapping of competencies, the stages of development, and most importantly, establishment of the pattems of linkages at state-AC levels lays important groundwork for explaining IGR. In fact, this study begins at similar points as did those related IGR studies in other federal countries, such as in Canada, Germany, the United States and Australia, and more recently in Brazil, Mexico and South Africa. Methodologically the study employs secondary source data analysis to electoral pattems and the control of AC govemments, mechanisms of collaboration, pattems of bilateral and multilateral interactions, trends in financial subventions and transfers, and in selected public policy arenas like environmental protection and tourism. The primary mode of analysis combines historical or epochal IGR evolution with supporting data explanation. The focus is distinctly institutional, identifying the initial and emerging roles, such as those of bilateral transfer commissions, multiple party collaborative commissions and vertical convenios. In doing so, the authors have made solid use of much publicly available data, most of which has not been previously analyzed. This volume will hopefully be the start of similar IGR projects in Spain. There is much that remains. For example, systematic analysis of the key actors and their actions at the AC level, to supplement the traditional coverage of the various elected governments in Madrid. Another issue is the role of the central bureaucracy in forming these relationships. Their representatives are hidden but no doubt primary actors. Yet another issue raised by this study but remaining relatively obscure are the tensions between bilateral and multilateral relations, so important in Spain. One could also add analysis of the developmental role of the Constitutional Tribunal in constructing the autonomic state. Finally, there are also important connections that are also part of IGR, with over ten thousand sub-AC governments: provinces, municipalities, comarcas, mancomunidades, vertical consortia, submunicipal governments, municipal corporations, and various public-private arrangements. Indeed, the IGR research agenda is quite extensive. This should not detract from this contribution, with its focus on the intensity, weight, hierarchical-nonhierarchical, nature of the symmetric and asymmetric IGR challenges. Like anyone of the number of countries that have experimented with federalism, the story is one of conflict, competition and cooperation all of which can contribute to diversity within unity through lasting self-rule and shared role. To paraphrase General Carl von Clausewitz, IGR is another means of continuation of political commerce designed to prevent more violent means.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDykinson eBooksSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207