MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522139924 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248823

The evaporative requirement for heat balance determines whole‐body sweat rate during exercise under conditions permitting full evaporation

2013· article· en· W1522139924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAgilent Technologies
KeywordsCalorimetryChemistrySteady state (chemistry)SWEATAnimal scienceThermodynamicsInternal medicineMedicineBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points A relative exercise intensity (% ) protocol is often used to compare absolute whole‐body sweat rates (WBSRs) during exercise between participants of different aerobic capacity. Under conditions permitting full evaporation, heat balance theory suggests that exercise intensity should be fixed to elicit the same rate of evaporation required for heat balance ( E req ). Whole‐body direct calorimetry was employed to measure WBSRs throughout 90 min of exercise across a range of air temperatures and rates of metabolic heat production. Irrespective of ambient temperature and metabolic heat production, E req alone described ∼90% of all variability in WBSR during steady‐state and non‐steady‐state exercise, whereas <2% of variation was independently described by % . To perform an unbiased comparison of WBSRs (but not necessarily core temperature) between different individuals/groups under conditions allowing full evaporation, future studies should consider using a fixed E req irrespective of the % incurred. Abstract Although the requirements for heat dissipation during exercise are determined by the necessity for heat balance, few studies have considered them when examining sweat production and its potential modulators. Rather, the majority of studies have used an experimental protocol based on a fixed percentage of maximum oxygen uptake (% ). Using multiple regression analysis, we examined the independent contribution of the evaporative requirement for heat balance ( E req ) and % to whole‐body sweat rate (WBSR) during exercise. We hypothesised that WBSR would be determined by E req and not by % . A total of 23 males performed two separate experiments during which they exercised for 90 min at different rates of metabolic heat production (200, 350, 500 W) at a fixed air temperature (30°C, n = 8), or at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production (290 W) at different air temperatures (30, 35, 40°C, n = 15 and 45°C, n = 7). Whole‐body evaporative heat loss was measured by direct calorimetry and used to calculate absolute WBSR in grams per minute. The conditions employed resulted in a wide range of E req (131–487 W) and % (15–55%). The individual variation in non‐steady‐state (0–30 min) and steady‐state (30–90 min) WBSR correlated significantly with E req ( P < 0.001). In contrast, % correlated negatively with the residual variation in WBSR not explained by E req , and marginally increased (∼2%) the amount of total variability in WBSR described by E req alone (non‐steady state: R 2 = 0.885; steady state: R 2 = 0.930). These data provide clear evidence that absolute WBSR during exercise is determined by E req , not by % . Future studies should therefore use an experimental protocol which ensures a fixed E req when examining absolute WBSR between individuals, irrespective of potential differences in relative exercise intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it