MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522354617 · doi:10.1111/ceo.12281

Mechanisms of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review

2013· review· en· W1522354617 on OpenAlexaff
Dov B. Kagan, Nathan Gorfinkel, Cindy Hutnik

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlaucomaIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyMechanism (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a safe and effective treatment for glaucoma, with greater cost effectiveness than its pharmacological and surgical alternatives. Nevertheless, although the basic science literature on selective laser trabeculoplasty continues to grow, there remains uncertainty over the mechanism by which laser trabeculoplasty reduces intraocular pressure. To address this uncertainty, the evidence behind several potential biological and mechanical mechanisms of selective laser trabeculoplasty were reviewed. In particular, cytokine secretion, matrix metalloproteinase induction, increased cell division, repopulation of burn sites and macrophage recruitment were discussed. Refining our understanding of these mechanisms is essential both to understanding the pathophysiology of ocular hypertension and developing improved therapies to treat the condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental OphthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207