MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522415155 · doi:10.21083/synergies.v0i2.1181

Le Récit de voyage comme document authentique : Paul et Raymonde Bonnetain au Soudan

2010· article· fr· W1522415155 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynergies Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé
 Paul Bonnetain, l’écrivain naturaliste connu pour ses multiples provocations et scandales, se voit confier en octobre 1892 par le ministère des Colonies et celui de l’Instruction publique une mission au Soudan. Au terme d’un périple de neuf mois à travers des contrées souvent hostiles, où l’ont accompagné sa femme et leur fille, il regagne la métropole avec force documents, fruits de ses observations. 
 
 Or, il ne reste aucune trace du contenu de son rapport, pas plus que du volume annoncé pourtant dans la presse et à peine quelques bribes de ses photographies. La raison doit-elle être recherchée dans la censure ministérielle dont Bonnetain se dit victime ? Toujours est-il que, comme pour contourner un interdit officiel, paraîtront un récit de voyage signée Raymonde Bonnetain et un recueil de nouvelles et de poèmes en prose sous la plume de Paul Bonnetain. 
 
 Ces textes, complémentaires et d’une grande richesse, soulèvent de nombreuses questions, notamment quant à leur statut : oeuvre littéraire, simple témoignage ou véritable document authentique ?
 Ce sont ces pistes et leur possible combinaison que se propose d’explorer cet article.
 
 
 Mots clés : Afrique, colonialisme, récit de voyage, réalisme/naturalisme, collaboration litteraire.
 
 Abstract
 Paul Bonnetain, a naturalist writer known for his many provocations and scandals, is entrusted with a mission to the Sudan in October 1892 by the Ministry of the Colonies and the Ministry of Education. Following a nine month trek through often hostile lands, accompanied by his wife and their daughter, he returns to the metropolis with many documents, fruits of his observations. 
 
 Yet there remains no trace of the content of his official rapport, nor of a volume announced in the press. Only a few photographs surface. Could the reason be the ministerial censure that Bonnetain claimed to be victim of? The fact remains that, as though to evade an official proscription, a travel book is published under the name of Raymonde Bonnetain as well as a collection of short stories and prose poetry signed Paul Bonnetain. 
 
 These very rich and complementary texts raise many questions, especially with regard to their status: literary work, simple testimony or genuine authentic document?
 
 It is these suggestions and their possible combinations, that this article intends to explore.
 
 Keywords: Africa, colonialism, travel writing, realism/naturalism, literary collaboration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it