MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522423792 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.1736

Le libéralisme insurrectionnel espagnol (1814-1830)

2004· article· fr· W1522423792 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Castells Oliván

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConstitutionPolitical scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous essayons d’expliquer le modèle révolutionnaire surgi en Espagne entre 1814 et 1820. Il se basait sur la conspiration dans des sociétés secrètes pour préparer le pronunciamiento insurrectionnel, dont l’objectif politique était l’implantation de la Constitution espagnole de 1812 par laquelle les principes de la Révolution française se propagèrent en Europe. Nous décrivons comment ce modèle de lutte contre l’absolutisme fut utilisé par les libéraux européens jusqu’aux révolutions de 1830, ainsi que son impact durant l’Europe de la Restauration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207