MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522435375 · doi:10.1177/229255031101900101

An Investigation of the Application of Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Dye Angiography in Pedicle Transverse Rectus Abdominus Myocutaneous Breast Reconstruction

2011· article· en· W1522435375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerfusionIndocyanine greenIndocyanine green angiographySurgeryBreast reconstructionAngiographyDebridement (dental)RadiologyBreast cancerFluorescein angiographyCancerVisual acuityInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pedicle transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (pTRAM) flaps remain the most common method of autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Using pTRAM flaps, complications often arise postoperatively, secondary to inadequate circulation. Tissues from distant angiosomes are associated with poorer perfusion, but this differs among patients. Many modalities have been used to reduce the risk of complications, but none have achieved widespread application. The authors believe that laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescent dye angiography (LA-ICGA) can potentially reduce the risk of complications. METHODS: In two routine, single-pedicle, ipsilateral pTRAM flaps, LA-ICGA imaging was performed following the division of the distal rectus muscle and deep inferior epigastric pedicle. The resulting images were used to guide design of the flap and debridement. RESULTS: In case 1, good perfusion was observed in zone 1 and part of zone 2. In case 2, good perfusion was observed in zone 1 and 50% of zone 3, with little perfusion in zone 2. In both cases, tissues with poor perfusion were debrided before transfer and inset. In both patients, there were no issues with wound healing, tissue necrosis or fat necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The variability of perfusion of the pTRAM flap among individuals is well appreciated. LA-ICGA helped to determine the limits of good perfusion and, therefore, the limits of tissue to be preserved for transfer and inset. This helped to avoid harvesting poorly perfused tissue that would have almost certainly experienced necrosis and, ultimately, would have reduced the risk of postoperative complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it