MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OPTIMIZING THE TEXTURE ATTRIBUTES OF A FAT‐BASED SPREAD USING INSTRUMENTAL MEASUREMENTS

2011· article· en· W1522502861 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Texture Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponse surface methodologyFactorial experimentPenetration (warfare)MathematicsTexture (cosmology)Food scienceMaterials scienceStatisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to investigate the effects of a commercial stabilizer and hemp oil content on the texture of pumpkin seed oil press‐cake spreads, using a penetration test as part of instrumental texture profile analysis. The response variables were the most significant spread texture attributes: hardness, penetration work, elasticity and adhesiveness. Spreads were formulated according to a central composite, two factorial experimental designs on five levels. Both independent variables significantly affected the texture of the obtained spreads, which had an appearance and texture comparable to commercial peanut butter. In terms of the selected texture attributes determined by the instrumental analysis, the optimum combination of variables with 1–1.2% of added stabilizer and 20–40% of added hemp oil produced desirable spreads that mimic commercial peanut butter; however, they were not sticky. RSM helped to optimize the composition of the spreads to obtain the product with the minimum hardness, penetration work and adhesiveness with the maximum value for elasticity. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This paper describes how the texture attributes of a novel fat‐based spread can be predicted using instrumental measurements, specifically a penetration test, while having peanut butter as a control sample to set desired value boundaries for each texture attribute separately. The penetration test was used to predict the texture of the spreads, compared with commercial peanut butter, without conducting the expensive and time‐consuming sensory evaluation of the product. The use of the response surface methodology and mathematical models could describe and predict experimental data of the component's content and to optimize the variables that mostly affected the spreads' texture. The described process can help in designing the spreads based on the pumpkin seed oil press‐cake with optimum texture properties. This screening technique can help the food industry to select formulations when new products are developed without using sensory panels at the product designing stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it