MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522612520 · doi:10.2450/2009.0003-09

SIMTI recommendations on the correct use of blood components and plasma derivatives.

2009· editorial· en· W1522612520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudio Velati, Giuseppe Aprili

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObligationMedicineIntensive care medicineBlood transfusionService (business)Transfusion medicineTask (project management)Transfusion therapyResource (disambiguation)Medical emergencyBusinessSurgeryPolitical scienceLawComputer scienceMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transfusion of blood components and plasma derivatives is often a life-saving treatment, but can also have side effects of considerable importance: this is the reason for the worldwide attention given to the problem of transfusion safety, which should be understood not only as the absence or removal of agents responsible for transfusion-transmissible diseases, but also in the wider perspective of guaranteeing the availability of the necessary blood component or plasma derivative at the right time for a given individual. It is, therefore, important to avoid using a resource, which in any case is limited, in situations in which it is not necessary, when it can only lead to risks, and to be able to have all the transfusion products required in situations in which such therapy is appropriate. In Italy there is a legal obligation for the Transfusion Service to adopt a procedure aimed at verifying the appropriateness of transfusion therapy. This control of the appropriateness of transfusion therapy does, however, presume that there are standards of behaviour and that these standards are known and collectively accepted not only by staff of the Transfusion Service, but also by professionals in medical and surgical fields that make use of transfusion therapy. The Italian Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology (SIMTI) recently undertook the task of proposing regulations for the behaviour, organisation and management of transfusion facilities, defining professional standards for Italy1, as already done by other scientific societies in some other countries, such as the United Kingdom, France, the United States of America and Canada. In the meanwhile, SIMTI asked its own working group to produce recommendations on the use of blood components and the main plasma derivatives based on a thorough review of the literature and similar, already published, documents. The task was completed, the results validated by the national organs of the scientific society and, at the end of 2008, a volume was published presenting the clinical recommendations on the transfusion of red blood cells, plasma and platelets, and on the use of albumin, immunoglobulins, antithrombin concentrates and prothrombin complex2. The primary aim of this work is to make a scientifically rigorous, updated document on transfusion matters available for all Italian transfusion services. The second aim, which is perhaps more demanding and of greater clinical relevance, is to stimulate debate on these matters between professionals in other medical and surgical fields and institutions, in order to produce, through a process of revision and updating of the initial text, a jointly agreed document that, therefore, constitutes true guidelines against which the appropriateness of transfusion therapy can really be evaluated. The key players necessary to transform this document from “recommendations into “guidelines are the National Centre and the scientific societies of other disciplines interested in transfusion therapy. The main setting into which the document could be introduced is that of the “Hospital Committees for the Good Use of Blood which Italian legislation requires in each hospital and which are the natural arena for clinical discussion and debate on the correct use of transfusions. We are also convinced that knowledge of and comparison with similar experiences in other countries and equivalent documents produced internationally are of great importance for drawing up our national document. For this reason, starting from the first issue of 2009, Transfusion will publish the SIMTI recommendations, beginning with those on the transfusion of red blood cells3. We are hoping to stimulate interest and discussion and to be able to publish comments and appraisals in our Journal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0160.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207