MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A New Model of Tubulobulbar Complex Budding in the Seminiferous Epithelium of the Testis

2015· article· en· W1522785350 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Lyon, Emy Bosseboeuf, A. Wayne Vogl

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyEndocytic cycleEndoplasmic reticulumBiologyUltrastructureActinCryofixationAnatomySertoli cellChemistrySpermatogenesisCellEndocytosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endocytic structures known as tubulobulbar complexes internalize intercellular attachments during sperm release. They are elongate structures capped with a clathrin‐coated pit. Their membranous core is a double‐membrane tube which is surrounded by a network of actin filaments. A bulbous region develops in the distal region which lacks the associated actin network but has a close association with cisternae of endoplasmic reticulum. The bulb eventually buds from the complex and enters endocytic compartments of the Sertoli cell. When rat testes were perfused for one hour ex vivo with oxygenated Krebs Henseleit buffer (with BSA) at 33°C containing either cytochalasin D (10, 20 or 40 µM) or the drug carrier (DMSO), apical TBCs at stage VII of spermatogenesis were associated with lower levels of actin in treated epithelia relative to controls. When evaluated at the ultrastructural level, the actin networks appeared patchy. In addition, ectopic bulbs and swollen tubular regions occurred. When thin sections of normal untreated samples were analyzed, large elongate bulbs and short tubular sections occasionally were observed. Together, these results suggest a new model for TBC vesiculation in which the actin network begins to disassemble and the tubular region begins to swell into a bulb. As the actin network continues to disassemble, the coated pit and most of the tubular region are incorporated into the enlarging bulb. Then the remaining short ‘neck’ of the bulb undergoes scission. Supported by a NSERC Discovery Grant to AWV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSperm and Testicular Function→French-language works237,207→