MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522816417 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2002.805239

Reduced-order H/sub ∞/ filtering for stochastic systems

2002· article· en· W1522816417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParametrization (atmospheric modeling)MathematicsConstraint (computer-aided design)Rank (graph theory)Filter (signal processing)Simple (philosophy)Applied mathematicsMathematical optimizationFiltering problemLinear systemOrder (exchange)Coupling (piping)Filtering theoryControl theory (sociology)Filter designComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysisCombinatoricsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the reduced-order H/sub /spl infin// filtering problem for stochastic systems. Necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for the existence of solutions to the continuous-time and discrete-time problems in terms of certain linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) and a coupling nonconvex rank constraint condition. Furthermore, when these conditions are feasible, an explicit parametrization of all desired reduced-order filters corresponding to a feasible solution is given. In particular, when the reduced-order filter is restricted to be a static one, then simple conditions expressed by LMIs only without any rank constraints are derived, and a parametrization of all solutions is also given. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it