Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Martial Arts phenomenon brings us to several modalities, each one with its own history, philosophy and special characteristics. Considering the Taekwondo and its characteristics as the object of this study, we are able to observe its manifestations as a sport for people with disabilities. Thus, the present study is developed on the basis of a qualitative study, and it sought to provide the physical education professionals with the general knowledge of Para-Taekwondo, in national and international level, as well to weave considerations of the paths that still need to be traversed. This study was organized in the form of chapter-articles, totalling three chaptersarticles and a final chapter with the final considerations. The chapters-articles are linked with the central objective of this study, however, each one has its own purpose and specific development. Therefore, we sought in this study some reflections on the Para-Taekwondo knowledge, which appears as the adaptation of the conventional Taekwondo to the participation of the people with upper limb amputation. For that, we used semi structured interviews as the methodology of the present study, collecting data from seventeen physical education teachers, also Taekwondo coaches that have been working with the conventional Taekwondo in Brazil, which are part of Group 1 in this study and also, for the Group 2, we collected data from seven teachers / coaches involved with the Para-Taekwondo in Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Guatemala and Venezuela. After the transcription, they were analyzed by the Enunciation technique, one of the Contend Analysis techniques. We realized that in the American continent landscape, the Para-Taekwondo is not yet fully structured, and works in the area are only in the beginning of its development. We consider that in order to achieve, in fact, a space in the high-performance Paralympics sports, there must be a better preparation of both teachers and the environments that surround this practice, and also better development of the sport modality, since, before thinking in Paralympics games, it's necessary to consider the increase and the expression of countries and people practicing and working within the sport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".