El conocimiento de las empresas y de la sociedad a partir de una sensibilidad literaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noes por supuesto fácil precisar el alcance de lo que podría denominarse "sensibilidad literaria". En principio, se supone que todo artista acostumbra enfrentar su relación con el mundo a partir de una así llamada sensibilidad especial. 3sta especificidad podría quizás comenzar a delinearse por oposición a la también así denominada sensibilidad convencional. Dicho de otro modo, la sensibilidad del escritor sería diferente en cuanto por ella se distanciara de la sensibilidad convencional. Visto así, el escritor en cuanto artista, estaría situado en el camino de un muy diferente tipo de percepción del mismo mundo de todos. Diferente en el sentido en un cierto distanciamiento del modo de ver convencional.* Ponencia presentada en el Coloquio Internacional El "Oficio" del dirigente: su pasado. su presente y su futuro. Montreal, junio de 1992.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".