MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W152298532

目标起始密码子多态性(SCoT):一种基于翻译起始位点的目的基因标记新技术

2009· article· zh· W152298532 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
潘玲华, 熊发前, 庄伟建, 唐荣华, 陈忠良

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2009
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

随着功能基因组学的发展,分子标记领域已开始从传统的随机或匿名性分子标记转向目的基因标记和功能性标记。目标起始密码子多态性(startcodon targeted polymorphism,SCOT)标记是一种基于翻译起始位点的目的基因标记新技术,具有操作简单、重复性好等特点,根据ATG翻译起始位点侧翼保守序列来设计单引物,扩增产生偏向候选功能基因区显性多态性标记,适合不同层次实验室的不同领域的广泛应用,SCoT标记已开始在水稻和花生上得到运用。本文旨在介绍给研究者一种可以作为传统的RAPD、ISSR标记有效补充的目的基因标记新技术,希望其广泛的应用于生物多样性分析、遗传图谱构建、重要性状标记等方面。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207