MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1523037166 · doi:10.3386/h0131

Social Reformers and Regulation: The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada

2000· report· en· W1523037166 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupré, Tomas Nonnenmacher

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2000
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1%(5 :25.,1* 3$3(5 6(5,(6 21 +,6725,&$/ )$&7256 ,1 /21* 581 *52:7+ 62&,$/ 5()250(56 $1' 5(*8/$7,21 7+( 352+,%,7,21 2) &,*$5(77(6 ,1 7+( 86 $1' &$1$'$ /HH -$OVWRQ 5XWK 'XSUp 7RPDV 1RQQHQPD.KHU +LVWRUL.DO 3DSHU 1$7,21$/ %85($8 2) (&2120,& 5(6($5&+ 0DVVD.KXVHWWV $YHQXH &DPEULGJH 0$ 1RYHPEHU )RU .RPPHQWV RQ DQ HDUOLHU GUDIW ZH WKDQN *HRUJH (PHU\ +HUE (PHU\ 3UL.H )LVKED.N %ULDQ *DLQHV -RKQ *ROGHQ *DU\ /LEH.DS 0DUYLQ 0.,QQLV 5L.KDUG 6L.RWWH 7RP 8OHQ DQG SDUWL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic Research→Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→