MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523097452

Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives

2009· book· en· W1523097452 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca J. Cook, Simone Cusack

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenConventionLegislationPsychologyIndex (typography)Gender equalityState (computer science)LawTable of contentsSocial psychologyTable (database)Political scienceGender studiesHuman rightsSociologyComputer scienceInternational human rights law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword, by Louise Arbour Table of Cases Table of Treaties, Legislation, and Other Relevant Instruments Introduction Ch. 1 Understanding Gender Stereotyping Ch. 2 Naming Gender Stereotyping Ch. 3 State Obligations to Eliminate Gender Stereotyping Ch. 4 Gender Stereotyping as a Form of Discrimination Ch. 5 The Role of the Women's Committee in Eliminating Gender Stereotyping Ch. 6 Moving Forward with the Elimination of Gender Stereotyping Appendices A. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women B. The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women Notes Select Bibliography Annotated List of Websites Index Acknowledgments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations174
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawFrench-language works237,207