MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523216658 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2005.1512831

Joint precoding and beamforming design for the downlink in a multiuser MIMO system

2006· article· en· W1523216658 on OpenAlexaff
R. Doostnejad, Teng Joon Lim, E. Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingBeamformingMIMOTransmitterTelecommunications linkOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFadingComputer scienceSpace-division multiple accessMIMO-OFDMZero-forcing precodingElectronic engineeringBit error rateAntenna (radio)Minimum mean square errorChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter power outputControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assuming perfect channel knowledge at the transmitter, we study space-time beamforming for the downlink in a multiuser multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel while a nonlinear interference pre-cancellation is presumed at the transmitter. The antenna arrays may be employed at both the transmitter and the receivers. The optimum transmit/receive beam vectors are obtained based on a minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) criterion and a per-user power constraint. In frequency selective fading channels, where orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is applied, the precoding and beamforming design is extended over space and frequency dimensions as well. In fact the proposed algorithm offers a unique method for assigning frequency bins in a MIMO-OFDMA system. The bit error rate performance of the proposed algorithm is assessed by computer simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207