MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523285057 · doi:10.1063/1.2404568

Coherent Modes in the Acoustic Frequency Range in Tokamaks

2006· article· en· W1523285057 on OpenAlexaff
X. Garbet, G. Falchetto, M. Ottaviani, R. Sabot, A. Sirinelli, A. Smolyakov

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTokamakTore SupraReflectometryExcitationRange (aeronautics)GeodesicPhysicsDispersion relationAcousticsComputational physicsDispersion (optics)Mode (computer interface)PlasmaOpticsComputer scienceMaterials scienceNuclear physicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a kinetic study of Geodesic Acoustic Modes and Beta Alfvén Eigenmodes. The dispersion relations of both modes are similar, which make them difficult to discriminate. However their poloidal structures and excitation mechanisms are different, thus providing a way to characterize them unambiguously. These results are briefly discussed in relation with reflectometry measurements on Tore Supra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207