MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523680033

Comparing cricket ears

2006· article· en· W1523680033 on OpenAlex
Glenn K. Morris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCricketAnatomyBiologyAcousticsZoologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic differences in response activity of the male and female cricket and a comparison of their musical calls were investigated. It was observed that most crickets call at a carrier wavelength near 4kHz, which is 7 cm and longer than any cricket's body dimensions. It was also found that female crickets were able localize singing males despite having a small body to create useful side-to-side amplitude differences by body diffraction. It was observed that tracheae in the ear anatomy of the cricket are branching and interconnected tubes, reinforced by spiraled exoskeleton. They conduct respiratory gases throughout the insect body and are preadapted to conduct sound. A trachea runs bodyward along the leg to the prothoracic segment. The cross-body trachea, together with the two leg tracheae comprised an acoustic system, with four entry points for sound, enabling the female cricket to localize a singing male.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it