MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523724710 · doi:10.5555/1357910.1358032

A stochastic particle-based biological system simulator

2007· article· en· W1523724710 on OpenAlexaff
Laurier Boulianne, Michel Dumontier, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Publications (Maastricht University) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocalityComputer scienceGridParticle systemStochastic simulationVisualizationStochastic modellingStochastic processSimulationDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simulation and visualization of biological systems is expected to enhance our understanding of biological processes towards the development of effective therapeutic treatments. Biological systems are inherently stochastic at the molecular level, exhibit modified behavior under crowded conditions and may be affected by spatial locality. Common simulation approaches fail to account for these important aspects of biological systems, in part because they are computationally expensive. Here, we describe a stochastic, particle-based simulator that takes spatial locality into account. Each particle in the system is represented explicitly on a 3D grid where only one particle can occupy a grid location. The grid structure and stochastic approach removes the need for distance calculation and particle search. We demonstrate the effect of molecular crowding and spatial locality for a simple biological system. We anticipate that this system will be useful in examining more complex systems. Finally, this system is expected to be suitable for acceleration with parallel customizable hardware, a necessary requirement towards the simulation of an entire cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Publications (Maastricht University)Same topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207