Incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in adult patients with mitochondrial disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Symmetrical polyneuropathy is a common feature of mitochondrial disease. Both axonal and demyelinating types are described, with Schwann cell abnormalities demonstrated on nerve biopsy. Some authors have also suggested an increased incidence of entrapment neuropathy. We identified 738 adult patients with proven mitochondrial disease seen in our centre in the past 25 years. One-hundred sixty seven of these patients had undergone nerve conduction studies as part of their routine clinical care, and the results of these studies were reviewed. We found an incidence rate of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) of 50.7 per 100,000 person-years; 32.5 per 100,000 person-years for men and 65.3 per 100,000 person-years for women. One other patient had evidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. The incidence of CTS in mitochondrial disease is similar to published rates for the UK general population. We found no evidence that mitochondrial disease per se increases the risk of entrapment neuropathy. We suggest that the pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of polyneuropathy in mitochondrial disease are quite distinct from the pathophysiology of CTS. Furthermore, it is essential that patients with mitochondrial disease who present with upper limb paraesthesia be referred for neurophysiological testing, so that treatable CTS is not missed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".