MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524102466 · doi:10.1002/nha3.10119

Women of Summer A Film Review

2000· review· en· W1524102466 on OpenAlexaff
Jodene Melinda Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Women of Summer” is a film documenting the plight of women in the 1920s and 1930s at the Bryn Mawr Summer School for Working Women. The struggle of women is well documented throughout history, and included in that struggle is the right to an education. Enter the Bryn Mawr Summer School for Working Women. As one of the ex‐faculty state, “It has taken radical ideas throughout history to change society ‐ and Bryn Mawr was one of them.” In 1884 five visionary women who called themselves “The Committee” created Bryn Mawr. “Then and now, Bryn Mawr remains committed to providing the educational preparation girls and young women need to lead lives of consequence” ( Bryn Mawr, No date , p. 1). The film “Women of Summer” wonderfully portrays the heartache and bliss women shared in an unforgiving time in society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource DevelopmentSame topicYouth Education and Societal DynamicsFrench-language works237,207