MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524305436 · doi:10.17955/107.1.563

Outcomes of an Auditory-Verbal Program for Children With Hearing Loss: A Comparative Study With a Matched Group of Children With Normal Hearing

2007· article· en· W1524305436 on OpenAlexafffund
Dimity Dornan, Louise Hickson, Bruce E. Murdoch, Todd Houston

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Volta Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyAudiologyHearing lossNonverbal communicationDevelopmental psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For children with hearing loss, success in the classroom is not only a result of curricular knowledge; it also encompasses a broad range of abilities from interaction with peers to clear, articulate speech.The spring 2007 issue of The Volta Review includes three articles in the areas of socialization, the outcomes of children enrolled in Auditory-Verbal therapy and phonological processes of children with cochlear implants.For teachers and school personnel, the information contained in each of these articles merits a close look.Research by Eriks-Brophy and colleagues utilizes a focus-group model to identify potential facilitators and barriers to the effective integration of children with hearing loss into their families and communities.Interviews with students with hearing loss, their parents and itinerant teachers of the deaf reveal challenges that are being addressed, as well as those that still remain.Not only does the research address the needs of students with hearing loss as they negotiate their school systems, group activities and social interactions, it also discusses the roles that mothers, fathers, siblings and professionals play in the process.Clearly, as more children with hearing loss enter mainstream settings earlier, the effects of integration on these students and their families will require further attention and study.The outcomes of Auditory-Verbal therapy as evaluated by monitoring a group of young children over four years is the focus of the first phase of a study by Dornan and colleagues.This study reviews the speech and language abilities of a group of 29 children ages 2 to 6 with severe-to-profound hearing loss as compared with the abilities of children with normal hearing of the same age.Performance across the measures assessed in this first phase indicates no significant differences between these two groups.Although the study participants comprise a small sample within a restricted age group, it is important to recognize the effects of intensive listening training on overall language development.Data on the overall progress of the children involved in this longitudinal study will be an important contribution to the field.Finally, the phonological processes of a select group of very young children with cochlear implants are the subject of the investigation by Buhler and colleagues.The authors address the development of phonological skills in children with cochlear implants through the use of evaluative procedures commonly used by school and early intervention speech-language pathologists (SLPs).Their results indicate that children who had greater experience using implants to hear performed better and demonstrated fewer phonological processes.These findings are particularly informative for early intervention SLPs who are providing services to children with cochlear implants because they identify tools and strategies that can be implemented readily.The Volta Review has evolved over the past few years into a publication that addresses both current and future needs of children with hearing loss.This evolution could not have been achieved without a remarkable managing editor and editorial board.However, as with so many things that change over time, so too do the editorial personnel.Managing Editor Dawn Scarola recently stepped down from her position at The Volta Review to take on a new role as the editorial production director for another Washington-based nonprofit publisher.Her energy and enthusiasm will be missed sorely.Additionally, longtime associate editor Mary Ellen Nevins is moving on to become national director of the newly developed Professional Preparation for Cochlear Implants (PPCI) program at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.To say she will be missed is an understatement.I am sure that I speak for the readers and the editorial board of The Volta Review when I offer Dawn and Mary Ellen our best wishes as they each embark upon new endeavors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Volta ReviewSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207