MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524350770 · doi:10.7202/038479ar

Une approche de la pauvreté par le non-recours aux droits sociaux

2009· article· fr· W1524350770 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Warin

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceExplicationSociologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’approche par le non-recours permet de classer les difficultés d’accès aux droits sociaux parmi les causes de la pauvreté. Mais si elle apporte des éléments d’explication au phénomène de la pauvreté, elle ne conduit pas pour autant à une représentation unifiée. De plus en plus appropriée par les acteurs publics, la prise en compte du non-recours sert aussi bien à opérationnaliser une approche administrative de la pauvreté économique qu’à reconnaître la nécessité d’une approche compréhensive mettant les individus au centre de la définition de l’offre publique. Par conséquent, l’offre publique n’est plus seulement interrogée dans son effectivité, mais aussi dans sa pertinence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207