“Changing Lanes”: Facilitating the Transition from Curative to Palliative Care
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little empirical work has been conducted assessing the perspectives of nurses regarding the barriers, facilitators, and strategies associated with achieving quality patient care at the end of life. A grounded theory study was conducted examining nursing behaviours and social processes inherent in the provision of quality end-of-life care from the perspective of generalist nurses (n = 10) working in an acute care setting. An inductively derived preliminary model, "creating a haven for safe passage", was developed based on the findings from this study and has been published elsewhere (1). This article provides a detailed description of one of the subprocesses of the model regarding the transition from curative to palliative care--the subprocess of "facilitating and maintaining a lane change". The various strategies which nurses used to effect a lane change, as well as the facilitators and barriers they encountered in this process, are presented. The consequences associated with both successful and unsuccessful lane changes are reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it