MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524552708 · doi:10.1344/rhi.v17i36.19864

El caso de la Barcelona Traction. Una revisión

2008· article· es· W1524552708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Beitia Alcalde

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de historia industrial · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este articulo pretende aportar respuestas a diversos interrogantes que han mantenido el caso de la espanolizacion de Barcelona Traction (BT) como inconcluso a pesar de los anos transcurridos y de su importancia. Las respuestas pueden ser utiles para descubrir las relaciones entre las partes principales, algunas de ellas solo sospechadas y otras sencillamente desconocidas. El rechazo al plan de 1945, la gestacion del Acta de 1951, las irregularidades del grupo BT y del grupo March, el abandono del Canada en sus tareas de tutela diplomatica, el apoyo britanico a March, la serie de negociaciones frustradas..., sirven para decidir quien fue el ganador neto del caso BT y que conductas fueron decisivas para ese desenlace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de historia industrialSame topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207