Could Fasting Plasma Glucose Be Used for Screening High-Risk Outpatients for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The simplified oral glucose tolerance test (sOGTT) with 50 g is recommended for the screening of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (1). However, because of the complexity of the test, the investigation of less expensive and easier methods to perform the screening has been extensively studied. Recently, in agreement with other studies (3), a population-based prospective study conducted on the general population of pregnant women in Brazil showed that fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was a good screening method for GDM (2). With the purpose of determining an FPG value with good sensitivity and specificity that could identify pregnant women at risk for GDM, we conducted a study in 1994 with high-risk outpatient pregnant women in the State University Hospital of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. During that year, 269 pregnant outpatients with at least one risk factor for GDM were included in the study. A screening test was performed on 261 pregnant women with 50 g of glucose load at …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".