MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1525299516

Review of an Upgrade to a Low Energy Lung Monitor; Comparison of Empirically Determined Decision Levels Using ACT-II vs. ACT-1 Detectors, and Development and Use of Decision Levels I N an IN VITRO Bioassay Program Using ABACOS 2000

2000· paratext· en· W1525299516 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2000
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpgradeDetectorComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)BusinessTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper the work previously reported in 1994 on the theory, development and use of empirically determined decision levels in an in vivo bioassay program is discussed. Recently performed hardware and software upgrades to the Low Energy Lung Monitor (LELM) are also discussed. New data that was collected after the upgrades is provided. The new data is compared to and contrasted with the data that was collected prior to the upgrades. Details on the use of ABACOS 2000 software to accomplish decision level reporting are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Same topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207