Characterization and Mapping of Contaminated Sediments, Windermere Arm, Hamilton Harbour, Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Windermere Arm is a 50-ha narrow channel located in the south-eastern portion of Hamilton Harbour, which is designated by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as one of the primary Areas of Concern in the Canadian waters of the Great Lakes. Sediments within the Arm have historically been contaminated with metals, PAHs, and to a lesser extent, PCBs. Sedimentological, geotechnical and geochemical investigations have been undertaken to determine the degree and the spatial extent of contamination. The thickness of contaminated sediment and their degree of contamination vary widely within the study site. Information on the thickness of contamination obtained from logging and chemical analysis of sediment cores agrees in general with the results of in situ penetrometer testing. Concentrations of Zn and Pb in some sub-samples are above the Severe Effect Level (SEL) for benthos set by the Ontario sediment quality guidelines. On average, surficial sediments tend to have lower metal concentrations than deeper sediments, probably due to the reduction of industrial point discharges. Apart from the two main boat slips, concentrations of PAHs are relatively low and in agreement with previously reported values. In contrast, new results yield higher values of PCB concentrations than previously reported, and 21 sub-samples of surficial sediment analyzed yielded values greater than 1 μg/g. Results suggest that the majority of recent PCB loadings are entering the study site from nearshore industrial spills or dumping, despite the detection of trace amounts of PCBs in a nearby creek. Pronounced sediment disturbance noted in several cores suggests that more contaminated historical sediments are at risk of being disturbed and re-exposed to the water column. Keywords: Sediment characteristics and quality sediment mapping toxic metals PAHs PCBs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".