MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1525844042 · doi:10.1109/ihtc.2014.7147547

Sports for global citizenship

2014· article· en· W1525844042 on OpenAlexaff
T.J. Malkinson, Chuan He

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSAIT Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacilitatorVisionEnablingPublic relationsValue (mathematics)CitizenshipDiversity (politics)Global citizenshipKnowledge managementNationalityPolitical scienceSociologyEngineering ethicsPsychologySocial psychologyComputer scienceEngineeringImmigration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As biological entities active movement is essential for our physical and emotional well-being. As citizens of an increasingly global community participation in sport regardless of circumstance facilitates citizenship among all peoples. Participation in non-competitive and competitive sports as an individual or as a member of a team regardless of economic status, nationality, gender, or ability is a facilitator of both self-understanding and for achieving an understanding other cultures and value systems. Both of these are essential for personal and career success. Existing and emerging technology is an enabler of international community engagement. We will communicate historical experience, current practice and provide visions for an approach from which will emerge an exciting future that incorporates the essence of the philosophy of sport and eliminates barriers to participation; increasing global understanding of the benefits of the diversity of cultures and value systems, and promoting a peaceful world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207