Tethered Bis(amidate) and Bis(ureate) Supported Zirconium Precatalysts for the Intramolecular Hydroamination of Aminoalkenes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tethered bis(amide) and bis(urea) proligands featuring a neutral chalcogen donor (O or S) in the backbone were synthesized and installed on zirconium via protonolysis. The bis(amidate) zirconium complexes adopt a κ 4 ( N,N,O,O ) binding motif and were characterized in the solid state with a pyridine donor. Likewise, the bis(ureate)‐supported complexes are also found to have a κ 4 ( N,N,O,O ) binding motif in the solid state however no additional donor ligand is required for discrete complex formation. No evidence for interaction between the neutral chalcogen donor and the zirconium atom is found for any of the transition metal species. All complexes were screened as precatalysts for the intramolecular hydroamination reaction with both primary and secondary aminoalkene substrates. Interestingly, the bis(ureate) species show similar reactivity to the bis(amidate) species, in contrast to a recently reported alkyl‐bridged bis(ureate) complex, which readily cyclizes secondary aminoalkenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it