Tethered Bis(amidate) and Bis(ureate) Supported Zirconium Precatalysts for the Intramolecular Hydroamination of Aminoalkenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tethered bis(amide) and bis(urea) proligands featuring a neutral chalcogen donor (O or S) in the backbone were synthesized and installed on zirconium via protonolysis. The bis(amidate) zirconium complexes adopt a κ4(N,N,O,O) binding motif and were characterized in the solid state with a pyridine donor. Likewise, the bis(ureate)‐supported complexes are also found to have a κ4(N,N,O,O) binding motif in the solid state however no additional donor ligand is required for discrete complex formation. No evidence for interaction between the neutral chalcogen donor and the zirconium atom is found for any of the transition metal species. All complexes were screened as precatalysts for the intramolecular hydroamination reaction with both primary and secondary aminoalkene substrates. Interestingly, the bis(ureate) species show similar reactivity to the bis(amidate) species, in contrast to a recently reported alkyl‐bridged bis(ureate) complex, which readily cyclizes secondary aminoalkenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".